What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

in structures, such as:

CDC warns of deadly listeria outbreak tied to packaged meals - CIDRAP

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

Have you ever really seen aliens or UFOs by yourself? Can you share your experience?

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

a b i 1 x []

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

Sapiente aperiam est dolores.

+ for

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

The First in 30 Years: Scientists Discover New Class of Antibiotics - SciTechDaily

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is: